Re: 2 servers with 1 database cluster - Mailing list pgsql-general

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: 2 servers with 1 database cluster
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0306100820430.13190-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 2 servers with 1 database cluster  ("Mark Cubitt" <mark.cubitt@applegate.co.uk>)
List pgsql-general
As another poster already pointed out, running two postmasters against the
same storage is officially a Very Bad Idea.

Also, it sounded like you might be looking at network attached storage
etc. to put your database on.  While isn't a Very Bad Idea, it is a path
fraught with danger.  For a database server, you're probably better off
having one very fast box that's either replicated or simply hot backed up
nightly from the live box.  Any dual CPU machine with a gig of memory and
a stack of drives underneath it can handle two front end application
servers handily.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jonathan Bartlett
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg_dumpall
Next
From: "Henrik Steffen"
Date:
Subject: Re: update phenomenon - solved