Re: Backup very large databases - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Roderick A. Anderson
Subject Re: Backup very large databases
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0204200632100.20224-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Backup very large databases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> I do agree that the special problems of running huge DBs on Postgres
> might belong in a pgsql-perform list rather than any of the regular
> lists.  Anyone else agree?  Or does the pgsql-general list readership
> want to see this stuff?

I don't mind it in general but would use a pgsql-perform list if it
existed.


Rod
--
             Why is it so easy to throw caution to the wind.
            Shouldn't it be heavier and shaped like an anvil?

                                                           Jon Anderson


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] general design question
Next
From: Steve Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Backup very large databases