Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> writes:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Francisco Reyes wrote:
>> I have about 7GB worth of data.
> I anticipate having a 30-50 GB or larger database in the next few months.
FWIW, there are people out there with multi-hundred-GB to TB databases
(you might try searching the archives for "American Chemical Society",
for instance). So you're not pioneers.
I do agree that the special problems of running huge DBs on Postgres
might belong in a pgsql-perform list rather than any of the regular
lists. Anyone else agree? Or does the pgsql-general list readership
want to see this stuff?
regards, tom lane
