Neil Conway writes:
> I'm curious; why is this "not the right fix"? According to the manpage:
>
> -l turns on maximum compatibility with the original
> AT&T lex implementation. Note that this does not
> mean full compatibility. Use of this option
> costs a considerable amount of performance...
The manpage also lists the specific incompatibilities. I think we should
not be affected by them, but someone better check before removing the -l.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
