Bruce Momjian writes:
> This is related to the Australian timezone duplication where we have a
> GUC parameter. Could we generalize the GUC stuff to allow arbitrary
> timezone mappings? Just an idea. Not sure it is worth it. The
> Australians complained but I have not hear complaints from other
> countries.
I claim that most of the time zone abbreviations that we have now are
purely theoretical fabrications.
What we need to think about is a system that is
* customizable
* internationalized
* consistent
* real
The current system is none of these things.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
