Re: Signals blocked during auth - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Signals blocked during auth
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0108221753111.679-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Signals blocked during auth  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Signals blocked during auth
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> I think this is fairly irrelevant, because a not-yet-backend should
> have a fairly short timeout (a few seconds) before just shutting
> down anyway, so that malfunctioning clients can't cause denial of
> service; the particular case you mention is just one scenario.

I have a note here about an authentication timeout on the order of a few
minutes.  You never know what sort of things PAM or Kerberos can go
through behind the scenes.

> OTOH, it'd be easy enough to turn on SIGTERM/SIGQUIT too, if you
> think there's really any value in it.

I think that would be reasonable.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST patches for 7.2 (please apply)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST patches for 7.2 (please apply)