Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> if you look into previous patch we sent (patch_72_systbl.gz)
> you could find patch for ./src/backend/catalog/index.c which
> is exact implementation of what 'seems to you' :-)
So you did. I'm not sure why I thought that was a bad idea when I
was reviewing the patch. Today it's obviously the right thing ;-)
> Teodor thought you don't like this idea and he moved functionality to
> initGISTstate. But he'd prefer his original implementation.
Roger, I'll stick it in.
regards, tom lane
