Re: Re: pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0103221751110.1208-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> > If it doesn't work, and will not be made to work, then let's remove it
> > from the tree.
>
> I tend to agree with Peter's slightly less drastic proposal: remove it
> >from the installed fileset and disable its man page, without necessarily
> 'cvs remove'ing all the source files.  (I see we have already removed
> all the other documentation references to it, so disconnecting the ref
> page from reference.sgml should be sufficient.)

I'll do this then.

>
> I hope that pg_upgrade will be of use again in the future, so even
> though it can't work for 7.1, a scorched-earth policy is not the way
> to go...
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Stock
Date:
Subject: initdb and data directories with lost+found
Next
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: Potential RC1-stoppers