Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0103221714510.1208-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Responses Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman writes:

> cc -G -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-h,libpsqlodbc.so.0 -Wl,-Bsymbolic info.o bind.o columninfo.o connection.o convert.o drvconn.o
environ.oexecute.o lobj.o misc.o options.o pgtypes.o psqlodbc.o qresult.o results.o socket.o parse.o statement.o gpps.o
tuple.otuplelist.o dlg_specific.o  -lm -Wl,-R/usr/local/pgsql/lib -o libpsqlodbc.so.0.26
 
> UX:ld: ERROR: psqlodbc.o: symbol: '_fini' multiply defined; also in file /usr/ccs/lib/crti.o
> gmake[3]: *** [libpsqlodbc.so.0.26] Error 1

This is a known portability problem on Unixware (at least known to me) and
probably other non-GCC setups.

> Why do WE define _fini?

Because we need to 'fini' something, I suspect.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Potential RC1-stoppers
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent run?