Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0103141725290.1211-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane writes:

> Maybe the AC_TRY_RUN tests could be moved up to before we start probing
> for libraries?

The overall order of the tests should stay this way, I think.  Some
library could actually alter the result of a run test.  (Think about some
-lcompat or -lbsd getting in the way, not unlikely at all with snprintf.)
Instead we could run an empty test program before the real tests.  If an
empty program fails to run we can abort in good conscience.

--
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: libpq PQstatus failed
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL