Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0307231027001.817-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:13:34AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > "If you tried PostgreSQL before, and it wasn't quite fast enough,
> > > and you went with Oracle, it's time to re-evaluate," suggests Rod
> >
> > Can I suggest you use "something else" instead of "Oracle"?  I know
> > it's weasely, but Oracle has lawyers and they're not afraid to use
> > them.
>
> How could Oracle sue us for claiming to be as good or faster?   MySQL does
> this all the time, and I don't see that it's landed them in any legal hot
> water.

Its not a fair statement and it is not rigorously proven. As such, I'd go
for a more generalised statement.

Gavin


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Next
From: elein
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL in Brazil