anoncvs and diff - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nigel J. Andrews
Subject anoncvs and diff
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0210031043100.26902-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: anoncvs and diff  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

I've been waiting to see how a patched file differs from my version.

The patch was added to the to apply list last week I think (it wasn't mine btw)
and I've been doing cvs diff to view the differences so I can tell when the
patch has been applied. Additional information given by this is the revision
number the comparison is against of course. This has stayed at 1.61 all the
time I've been doing this cvs diff operation. Looking at the web interface to
cvs I see the file has a revision number of 1.64. I use the anoncvs server for
my operations. Am I being daft or is there a problem with the anoncvs archive?


-- 
Nigel J. Andrews



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mario Weilguni"
Date:
Subject: Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...
Next
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: Correlation in cost_index()