Re: anoncvs and diff - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: anoncvs and diff
Date
Msg-id 200210031548.g93FmTT05363@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to anoncvs and diff  ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>)
Responses Re: anoncvs and diff  ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> 
> 
> I've been waiting to see how a patched file differs from my version.
> 
> The patch was added to the to apply list last week I think (it wasn't mine btw)
> and I've been doing cvs diff to view the differences so I can tell when the
> patch has been applied. Additional information given by this is the revision
> number the comparison is against of course. This has stayed at 1.61 all the
> time I've been doing this cvs diff operation. Looking at the web interface to
> cvs I see the file has a revision number of 1.64. I use the anoncvs server for
> my operations. Am I being daft or is there a problem with the anoncvs archive?

That is strange.  anoncvs and the web interface should have the same
version number.  What file are you looking at? 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas O'Connell
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone want to assist with the translation of the Advocacy site?
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone want to assist with the translation of the Advocacy