Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0011262252000.764-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?  (GH <grasshacker@over-yonder.net>)
Responses Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?  (GH <grasshacker@over-yonder.net>)
Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
GH writes:

> Either way, any suggestions?

Personally, I don't trust pg_ctl farther than I can throw it.  Consider
not using it.

--
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind GlomsrØd)
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on RedHat High Availability Server.
Next
From: GH
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?