Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0007021717440.351-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to 7.0.2 on Solaris  (pgsql-hackers@thewrittenword.com)
Responses Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris
List pgsql-hackers
pgsql-hackers@thewrittenword.com writes:

> 3. Why is NAN defined in src/include/solaris_i386.h as:
> #define                            NAN     (*(__const double *) __nan)
> #endif   /* GCC.  */
> if the compiler is not GCC? The Solaris C compiler does not like this.
> I removed it and the compilation succeeded.

We never cleared out this item. What is the proper way to generate a `NaN'
on your compiler? Does `0.0/0.0' work?


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Makefile for parser
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items