When the libpq shared library is linked on my system it looks like this:
ld -Bdynamic -shared -soname libpq.so.2.1 -o libpq.so.2.1 fe-auth.o
fe-connect.o fe-exec.o fe-misc.o fe-print.o fe-lobj.o pqexpbuffer.o
dllist.o pqsignal.o -lcrypt -lc
Now if I build a Kerberos IV enabled version it looks like
ld -Bdynamic -shared -soname libpq.so.2.1 -o libpq.so.2.1 fe-auth.o
fe-connect.o fe-exec.o fe-misc.o fe-print.o fe-lobj.o pqexpbuffer.o
dllist.o pqsignal.o -lcrypt -lkrb -ldes -lc
Note that the relevant Kerberos libraries are specified so the user
doesn't have to remember linking his libpq programs against Kerberos.
My question is, shouldn't libpq be linked against *all* the libraries that
are detected at configure time? Imagine that libpq uses something from,
say, -lbsd. We'd never know because psql links against -lbsd so everything
is resolved but the end user may not know that and fail to link his
programs against -lbsd. I guess what I'm saying is, there seems to be a
double standard of -lcrypt, -lc, -lkrb, and -ldes versus all other
libraries.
Any library guru care to enlighten me?
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
