Jeffery Collins writes:
> Wanna' bet? Perhaps I had an even older version?
FWIW, it turns out that mine is actually 2.2.1.
> I don't know alot about the readline library, but perhaps it would be
> sufficient to check for the presence of "using_history" in the library
> and not bother to check for the presence of history.h?
After reviewing the old code, this is seemingly what it did. The history
functions are then used without declaring them. I should probably squeeze
a patch for this into 7.0.1. Of course, updating readline to a "sane"
version is a valid workaround as well. (And believe me, there are plenty
of "insane" versions out there that we already had to put up with.)
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden