Re: Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ryan Kirkpatrick
Subject Re: Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.10.9907301124410.4356-100000@excelsior.rkirkpat.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha)  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Ryan Kirkpatrick wrote:
>
> >     Sounds good... Only the alpha fixes don't fall under the heading
> > of "*easily* fixed in -stable", so they ought to stay out of there for
> > now.
>
> If there are even pieces of the alpha patches that can be applied to the
> central repository, please submit them for inclusion...#ifdef __alpha__
> works quite well :)  Reducing the size of the patch for each release is
> always a good thing...

    That is what I plan to do in the coming months as I review the
alpha patches chagne by change. And yes, #ifdefs are always good to use!
:)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   "For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain."                     |
|                                            --- Philippians 1:21 (KJV)    |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Ryan Kirkpatrick  |  Boulder, Colorado  | rkirkpat@nag.cs.colorado.edu  |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               http://www-ugrad.cs.colorado.edu/~rkirkpat/                |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Cannot insert into temp tables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patches for Postgresql on Linux/Alpha!