Re: Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha)
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.05.9907301355280.78452-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha)  (Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat@nag.cs.colorado.edu>)
Responses Re: Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Ryan Kirkpatrick wrote:

>     Sounds good... Only the alpha fixes don't fall under the heading
> of "*easily* fixed in -stable", so they ought to stay out of there for
> now.

If there are even pieces of the alpha patches that can be applied to the
central repository, please submit them for inclusion...#ifdef __alpha__
works quite well :)  Reducing the size of the patch for each release is
always a good thing...

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ryan Kirkpatrick
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Next
From: Ryan Kirkpatrick
Date:
Subject: Patches for Postgresql on Linux/Alpha!