Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter T Mount
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.95.980418113946.7910C-100000@maidast.demon.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq  (Maarten Boekhold <maartenb@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 18 Apr 1998, Maarten Boekhold wrote:

> Wasn't the problem with OOB data that java doesn't support this? I
> remember that OOB data has come up before on this list a long time ago,
> and that at that time some java bloke (peter?) started to complain :)

I said at the time, that I wasn't certain that Java did or didn't support
it. Since then, I have noticed references to it, but I've lost them since.

I'm delving into the docs as I type, looking for this.

--
Peter T Mount  petermount@earthling.net or pmount@maidast.demon.co.uk
Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter T Mount
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] lock failed and buffer leak
Next
From: Mattias Kregert
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fsync -> fdatasync in backend/storage/file/fd.c