Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0806092243080.11286@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  ("Koichi Suzuki" <koichi.szk@gmail.com>)
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Tom Lane wrote:

> It should also be pointed out that the whole thing becomes uninteresting
> if we get real-time log shipping implemented.  So I see absolutely no
> point in spending time integrating pg_clearxlogtail now.

There are remote replication scenarios over a WAN (mainly aimed at 
disaster recovery) that want to keep a fairly updated database without 
putting too much traffic over the link.  People in that category really 
want zeroed tail+compressed archives, but probably not the extra overhead 
that comes with shipping smaller packets in a real-time implementation.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Next
From: "汪琦"
Date:
Subject: a question about exec_simple_query()