Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0704180814490.14766@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Richard Huxton wrote:

> And at the end of the day that's the root of the problem. It's easy to be
> lulled into "well it looks like a primary key" rather than being able to
> guarantee it.

In some of these cases it is guaranteed to be a primary key given all
available information at the time.  The funny thing about unexpected
changes to a business model is that you never expect them.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys