Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
Date
Msg-id 4625E35C.2060708@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys  ("Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>)
Responses Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Craig A. James wrote:

> Since we're only aggregating information, we have
> no control over the data that these companies provide.

And at the end of the day that's the root of the problem. It's easy to
be lulled into "well it looks like a primary key" rather than being able
to guarantee it.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Craig A. James"
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys