On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 25 March 2006 11:58, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Um, what other resources are rated higher? If you'll pardon my
>>> ignorance, what other resources is the search engine considering at all?
>>
>> Below is the weights. As John said earlier they just decide who's links
>> show up first.
>>
>> It seems to me that archives should be secondly only to
>> www.postgresql.org. Once the new techdocs is live and we get some solid
>> content on there, then we can push that up.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> # User contributed stuff
>> SiteWeight http://techdocs.postgresql.org/ 50
>> SiteWeight http://archives.postgresql.org/ 50
>>
>
> Should planetpostgresql.org get added to this section?
>
> Also maybe Oleg/Teodor could wiegh in with which sites they are currently
> indexing in pgsql.ru ?
we have 78 sites indexed, see http://pgsql.ru/db/pgsearch/stat.html
and do nothing with weights.
>
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
