Re: N-to-N implementation - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re: N-to-N implementation
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.63.0507212001470.10181@ra.sai.msu.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to N-to-N implementation  ("Filipe Knoedt" <filipe@brasilenergia.com.br>)
List pgsql-admin
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Filipe Knoedt wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to set up a discussion (if necessary) about two different ways to implement N-to-N relationships: using a
N-to-Nintermediary table or, suppose an A and B tables situation, creating the primary key of the table B with the A.id
plusa sequencer. 
>
> I'm thinking on going the second way, but decided to ask the list if anybody sees any potencial problem in it, like
forperformance or anything. 

we use contrib/intarray to avoid joining

>
> Filipe Knoedt

     Regards,
         Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Filipe Knoedt"
Date:
Subject: N-to-N implementation
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PGSQL 7.4.8 : idle in transaction problem