On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Nicolai Petri (lists) wrote:
> We also use PostgreSQL as our primary db so it would be more than likely
> that we would donate money for something similar with postgresql if
> either :
> a) we can direct the money at one or more specific tasks
> or
> b) the tasks founded will be related to core postgresql features e.g.
> generel performance or other benefits that fits all.
>
The problem is organization. Who decides who gets what money? What about
features that are paid for and worked on and not accepted into the
community codebase? This was something I hoped the PostgreSQL Foundation
http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/ would step in and do, but we seem much
more focused on advocacy efforts rather than developemnt ones.
Kris Jurka
