On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, [iso-8859-1] Mart�n Marqu�s wrote:
> OK, now I'm more then astonished!
> Why was I able to insert as martin then?
> Isn't it true (as the docs say) that when I execute a query over a view with
> rules, the rules (querys in the DO of the RULE) are executed with permssions
> of the owner of the rule (or the view? Any way, martin is owner of both) and
> not of the user that executed the query?
No. With both views and rules, the actions are executed as the user who
executed the query. I don't know if there are plans to allow the 'execute
as owner' for rules, right now this option only exists for the triggers.
