Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB?? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brett W. McCoy
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSI.3.91.990513160539.12249G-100000@access1.lan2wan.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??  (Brian <signal@shreve.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Brian wrote:

> > I am assuming here, of course, that this didn't change betwen 6.3 and 6.4
> > (which is what I am using).
>
> ok, so then I am assuming:
>
> /usr/bin/postmaster -B 256 -i -S -D/var/lib/pgsql -o -F -S 1024
>
> is what I would want...............

Yep.  You can also put the -B as a backend option, but under postmaster,
it still does the shared buffer allocation.

Brett W. McCoy
                                         http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"When are you BUTTHEADS gonna learn that you can't oppose Gestapo
tactics *with* Gestapo tactics?"
        -- Reuben Flagg


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Next
From: Karl DeBisschop
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??