Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.44.0301131000450.39187-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  ("Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:

> On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 greg@turnstep.com wrote:
> >
> > > > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > > > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
> > >
> > > Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?
> >
> > Any given day.  It's disk space, not traffic.
>
> I think anyone thinking of putting up a mirror will want to know
> traffic volumes.

The only info I could give was what I already did.  My above statement
was to clarify the above numbers.

Vince.
-- Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond!  http://www.pop4.net/  http://www.meanstreamradio.com
http://www.unknown-artists.com       Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_get_constraintdef
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?