Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date
Msg-id 20030113151530.GC3889@wallace.ece.rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:01:38AM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> 
> > On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 greg@turnstep.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > > > > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?
> > >
> > > Any given day.  It's disk space, not traffic.
> >
> > I think anyone thinking of putting up a mirror will want to know
> > traffic volumes.
> 
> The only info I could give was what I already did.  My above statement
> was to clarify the above numbers.

And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc?) indicating that
the bandwidth was down in the noise for them (as an ISP).

Ross


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: default to WITHOUT OIDS?