Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0011071655450.2607-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
If its that easy to fix the regress test so that it passes, can we get it
committed and build a new tarball so that ppl doing regression on v7.0.3
see a clean regress?

On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Pete Forman <gsez020@kryten.bedford.waii.com> writes:
> > The only remaining failure is geometry.  The results I got were nearly
> > identical to geometry-powerpc-aix4.out.  The only differences were the
> > order of rows returned by three of the tables.  I'll submit the
> > results file to pgsql-patches.
> 
> Rather than making still another results file, let's fix the .sql file
> to do an explicit ORDER BY for those queries.  The regress tests are
> mostly pretty lazy about ensuring a platform-independent ordering of
> query results.  In many places we can get away with that, but every so
> often we notice another place where we can't.  Looks like you've just
> identified another.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> 

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Martin A. Marques"
Date:
Subject: still with problems to run configure
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Issue NOTICE for attempt to raise lock leve l?