RE: Status of new relation file naming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject RE: Status of new relation file naming
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0009142110400.94875-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Status of new relation file naming  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Mikheev, Vadim wrote:

>  
> > > Rename... Why would we need in rename with OID filenames?
> > 
> > Andreas seems to refer to in place replacement of OID files e.g.
> > using your *relink*.
> 
> Sorry, I've messed things for myself.
> 
> Ok. In short, I vote for UNIQUE_ID (unrelated to pg_class.oid) file names.
> I think that it's better to implement this (but neither OID nor OID.VERSION)
> right now
> because of this is like what we'll have in new smgr -
> tablespace_id.relation_file_node.
> Pg_class' OID is kind of logical things, totaly unrelated to the issue
> how/where to
> store relation file.
> 
> Please comment ASAP.

sounds perfect to me 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: Status of new relation file naming
Next
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: Status of new relation file naming