On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Tim Perdue wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > just curious, but what if you remove the ORDER BY, just to test ... is it
> > that much faster without then with? Just want to narrow down *if* its a
> > sorting issue or not, that's all ...
>
> Good call - it was instantaneous as it used to be.
It takes us awhile sometimes, but we eventually clue in :)
> > If it is a sorting issue, what if you raise the -S value?
>
> -S is 32768 right now
how many results come back from the query? ignoring the LIMIT, that is
... see, it has to ORDER BY before the LIMIT, of course...
