Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.05.9907191104150.64002-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > Can I have votes on what people want the next version number to be?
> > We have to brand the release when we start development(PG_VERSION 
> > file). 6.5 probably should have been called 7.0, but we had already 
> > committed to 6.5.
> 
> We've been making pretty steady progress over the last few releases.
> I'd suggest that a bump to 7.0 should happen when we've accumulated
> most of the fixes/improvements from the "hot list". We've worked
> through most of those; here are the ones I'd like to see at or before
> a 7.0 release:
> 
> o implement outer joins
> o merge date/time types and deprecate the old 4-byte ones

My opinion is that MVCC should have jump'd us to 7.0 in the first
place...

IMHO, release for October should be v7.0 ... if the above two get done,
great, if not, no probs...

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: os.h
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] CVS