Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: pg_recvlogical requires -d but not described on the documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: pg_recvlogical requires -d but not described on the documentation
Date
Msg-id OSCPR01MB14966F6BA7B93EF637D256394F5DE2@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_recvlogical requires -d but not described on the documentation  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses RE: pg_recvlogical requires -d but not described on the documentation
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Dear Fujii-san,

Thanks for giving comments and sorry for missing replies.

> I agree that the synopsis doesn't need to be updated. Attached patch clarifies
> the required options for each action in the documentation. Thought?

So, the policy David said is not to modify the synopsis part here, because there
are no rules or it is broken. Instead, we could clarify the mandatory options in
the doc, right?
I have no objections for it.

> BTW, I'm curious why --dbname isn't required for the --drop-slot action.

I'm analyzing around here...

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optionally record Plan IDs to track plan changes for a query
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: pg_recvlogical requires -d but not described on the documentation