Re: Odd blocking (or massively latent) issue - even with EXPLAIN - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Martin French
Subject Re: Odd blocking (or massively latent) issue - even with EXPLAIN
Date
Msg-id OF4731D4BD.B722B5CE-ON80257A44.004B3A30-80257A44.004BABD3@LocalDomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Odd blocking (or massively latent) issue - even with EXPLAIN  (Jim Vanns <james.vanns@framestore.com>)
Responses Re: Odd blocking (or massively latent) issue - even with EXPLAIN
List pgsql-performance
<p><font face="sans-serif" size="2">Hi</font><br /><br /><tt><font size="2">> <br />> We're seeing SELECT
statementsand even EXPLAIN (no ANAYLZE) <br />> statements hang indefinitely until *something* (we don't know
what)<br/>> releases some kind of resource or no longer becomes a massive bottle<br />> neck. These are the
symptoms.<br/></font></tt><br /><tt><font size="2">Is this in pgAdmin? Or psql on the console?</font></tt><br
/><tt><fontsize="2"><br />> However, the system seems healthy - no table ('heavyweight') locks are<br />> held by
anysession (this happens with only a few connected sessions),<br />> all indexes are used correctly, other
transactionsare writing data (we<br />> generally only have a few sessions running at a time - perhaps 10) etc.<br
/>>etc. In fact, we are writing (or bgwriter is), 2-3 hundred MB/s<br />> sometimes.<br /></font></tt><br
/><tt><fontsize="2">What is shown in "top" and "iostat" whilst the queries are running?</font></tt><br /><br
/><tt><fontsize="2">> <br />> We regularly run vacuum analyze at quiet periods - generally 1-2s daily.<br />>
<br/>> These sessions (that only read data) that are blocked can block from<br />> anything from between only 5
minutesto 10s of hours then miraculously<br />> complete successfully at once.<br />> <br /></font></tt><br
/><tt><fontsize="2">Are any "blockers" shown in pg_stat_activity?<br /></font></tt><br /><tt><font size="2">> <br
/>>checkpoint_segments = 128<br />> maintenance_work_mem = 256MB<br />> synchronous_commit = off<br />>
random_page_cost= 3.0<br />> wal_buffers = 16MB<br />> shared_buffers = 8192MB<br />>
checkpoint_completion_target= 0.9<br />> effective_cache_size = 18432MB<br />> work_mem = 32MB<br />>
effective_io_concurrency= 12<br />> max_stack_depth = 8MB<br />> log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0<br />>
log_lock_waits= on<br />> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.1<br />> autovacuum_naptime = 8<br />>
autovacuum_max_workers= 4<br /></font></tt><br /><tt><font size="2">Memory looks reasonably configured to me.
effective_cache_sizeis only an indication to the planner and is not actually allocated. <br /></font></tt><br
/><tt><fontsize="2">Is anything being written to the logfiles?</font></tt><br /><br /><tt><font
size="2">Cheers</font></tt><fontface="sans-serif">============================================= Romax Technology
LimitedRutherford House Nottingham Science & Technology Park Nottingham, NG7 2PZ England Telephone numbers: +44
(0)115951 88 00 (main) For other office locations see: http://www.romaxtech.com/Contact
================================================ E-mail: info@romaxtech.com Website: www.romaxtech.com
================================================= Confidentiality Statement This transmission is for the addressee only
andcontains information that is confidential and privileged. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorised to
receiveit on behalf of the addressee you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received
thistransmission in error please delete from your system and contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.
=================================================</font>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Daniele Varrazzo
Date:
Subject: Re: Shards + hash = forever running queries
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd blocking (or massively latent) issue - even with EXPLAIN