Unsubscribe me. Or Can anyone forward me the emailId of the concerned
person..??
Regards,
Anjali Sinha
ASCG, Reliance Infocomm
J Block, SB-11, 2nd Floor,
Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City,
Thane Belapur Road, New Mumbai India, 400 709
DID: 91 22 30387862
____________________________________________
Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@alvh.no-ip.or To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
g> cc: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, Robert Treat
Sent by: <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, (bcc: Anjali
pgsql-hackers-owner@pos Sinha/INFOCOMM/RIL) tgresql.org Subject:
Re:[HACKERS] Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? Importance: Normal
Sender'sOU: Reliance |------------------|
| [ ] Confidential | 10/07/2005 09:38 PM
|------------------|
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
> > they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a
hack.
>
> Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
> both
>
> int pg_cancel_backend(int)
> bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
>
> with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?
+1
--
Alvaro Herrera
http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca"
(Orual)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
