Re: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation
Date
Msg-id NOEFLCFHBPDAFHEIPGBOGEHCCDAA.simon@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation  (elein <elein@varlena.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation
List pgsql-advocacy
> elein wrote...
>
> Reasoning is interested in doing a white paper evaluation
> on PostgreSQL.  I am not yet sure what sort of cooperation
> on our side this will entail or if it will get off the
> ground.  But I'm planning to encourage them to do the
> evaluation and facilitate any cooperation we need to
> provide.
>

Now is the right time to do it, so we can fix any issues uncovered.

If we can then fix them all during beta, Reasoning can publish their results
at same time as 8.0 goes production.

If they do find issues, it will be good for them to say "we found N issues"
and good for PostgreSQL community, since an external assessment will be
good, as well as saying how efficient out beta programme is/was.

Best regards, Simon Riggs


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: elein
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation