Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Jason Hihn
Subject Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPOEBECBAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?  ("Bruno Baguette" <bruno.baguette@netcourrier.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
It's OLD anyway - almost a year. And they obviously were only using Windows
to test on, so it couldn't have been a serious test ;-)

Just another reason to have native windows support... ahem. ;-)


-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Bruno Baguette
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 8:50 AM
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Server Databases Clash : NO mention of
PostgreSQL ?


Hello,

Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of
theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout
having added PostgreSQL ?

Here's the URL of the article :
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

Thanks in advance !

-------------------------------------------------
Bruno BAGUETTE - bruno.baguette@netcourrier.com


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?
Next
From: "Heather Carle"
Date:
Subject: LinuxWorld/Computerworld story on PostgreSQL