Re: What is the best platform for Business - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Jason Hihn |
---|---|
Subject | Re: What is the best platform for Business |
Date | |
Msg-id | NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPEELCCCAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | What is the best platform for Business application development ("Akan T Rajah" <akan@weblords.com>) |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Stay away from Informix. That's a $20,000 wasted, and with an uncertain future IMHO. Component: Favorite -> least fav Database: PostgreSQL, Oracle, MySQL Language: Python, JPython, PHP (web-only), Java, C++ Toolkit: wxWindows (used everywhere, where applicable (Python, C++)) Alternate Toolkit: Qt (for C++ only) -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Akan T Rajah Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:52 PM To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] What is the best platform for Business application development > Hello Everyone. > If you had a change to do everything all over what would you do. I mean > that if you had a chance to rewrite your application what would you choose > as your main database and what would you choose as the development > language/tool. I know many of you would be biased to the one you are using > most of the time, so lets here your opinion. I know similar question was > asked back in 2001, I think the industry has changed we can talk about it > again. > > Assumption is that you are rewriting everything, and the application is for > external users - i.e for resale. Typical clients should be from demo users > (free), single users, to large number of users. It should be able to run on > multiple platform /OS - Win32, Linux, Unix, Palm OS 5.0 etc. And also be > able to have a web front end. > > Progress lacks a demo version as progress client requires license - unless > progress works on the Developer's Briefcase from PosseNet.org for this. MSDE > is good for this since it is free to distribute and you can have some > multi-user capabilities too , it is also easy to port to SQL2000 for high > volume, High users. - SQL2000 is compariable to Progress on a Windows > platform. When you introduce Palm and Pocket PC, Sybase's SQL Anywhere looks > good. So lets here all your comments. (I am cross posting this to others db > users groups - and will try to summarize the results). No Microsoft > bashing, if they are good then let it be. > > Some of the Database are: > 1) Informix - May be IBM do not want this anymore > 2) DB2 Universe > 3) MySQL > 4) Progress > 5) PostgreSQL > 6) FirebirdSQL > 7) InterBase > 8) Oracle > 9) SQLAnywhere from Sybase > 10) HSQ > 11) Sapdb from Sapdb.com > 12) Sqlite > 13) BerkeleyDb from sleepycat.com - very good for small foot print > 14) Code Base > 15) MSDE and SQL2000 > > Languages > 1) Progress 4GL > 2) Informix 4GL > 3) PowerBuilder > 4) SheerPower4GL - only windows > 5) Sun One (Formally Forte) > 6) Aubit4GL > 7) RPG-II > 8) .NET > 9) Java > > Tools > 1) Borland Suite > 2) CodeWorrior Suite > 3) Progress Provision > 4) Websphere > 5) Sun One > 6) Visual Studio.NET > 7) Satellite Form > 8) Welogic from Bea > 9) Other open source > > You guys can add your own too. > > Akan T Rajah > www.weblords.com > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
pgsql-advocacy by date: