On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 at 15:55, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are typos in return type of these functions:
> 1) timestamptz_pl_interval_at_zone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> NOW: PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMP(timestamptz_pl_interval_internal(timestamp,
> span, attimezone));
> SHOULD:
> PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ(timestamptz_pl_interval_internal(timestamp, span,
> attimezone));
> 2) Datum timestamptz_mi_interval_at_zone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> NOW: PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMP(timestamptz_mi_interval_internal(timestamp,
> span, attimezone));
> SHOULD:
> PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ(timestamptz_mi_interval_internal(timestamp, span,
> attimezone));
>
> You’re right — these are just typos, and they don’t affect correctness since both
> ultimately call Int64GetDatum().
> Still, +1 for fixing them for clarity.
The functions timestamptz_pl_interval() and timestamptz_mi_interval() have the
same typos, right?
--
Regards,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.