Eekk.. good point. back to the drawing board..
Could we get a list of folks that would be willing to run a replicated
server,
make them into a "server pool" and get the mirrors to connect to them..
I'm not sure if that would be a great solution, cause i'm not sure if most
of the traffic is because of images, static code, or whatever would be
coming
from the database...
I guess at the very least it's still good for discussion.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@hub.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:36 PM
> To: Jeff MacDonald
> Cc: Vince Vielhaber; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [GENERAL] website design
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
> > Would this be a good "in practice" way to show off the
> replication features
> > ?
>
> would be except that now you are *really* throwing more heavy duty
> requirements for the mirror sites themselves ... it was enough that we
> required PHP4 ... requiring them to run a database to go along with that
> would just be pure evil :)
>
> > >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@hub.org]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 7:55 PM
> > > To: Jeff MacDonald
> > > Cc: Vince Vielhaber; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] website design
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just a suggestion, but is the page allowed to be database driven,
> > > > ie: something like a blog [us pre existing code like slashcode or
> > > > postnuke or something]
> > > >
> > > > or does it have to be static to support the mirroring that
> is currently
> > > > in place.
> > >
> > > has to be mirrorable ... vince and I have tried, in the past,
> to think of
> > > a good way of making it both dynamic *and* mirrorable, but
> never was able
> > > to come up with what we thought were clean methods ... if you
> can think of
> > > something, please feel free to propose it though, since there
> are various
> > > projects we are working on that are going to be more database
> driven, and,
> > > therefore, less mirrorable ;(
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
