Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEKCCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> It has not been fixed.  One TODO item is to either stop mentioning hash
> at all or get it improved.  We have been sitting on the fence for too
> long.

Could someone give me a quick rundown on where using a hash index would be
advantageous over using a btree index?

Thanks,

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Nicolas Bazin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum daemon (pgvacuumd ?)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users