Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAELGCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
List pgsql-patches
> But the parts that are replacing 'head -1' by 'sed q' should definitely be
> applied.  Although I'd prefer 'sed 1q'.

What's wrong with "head -n 1"??  Surely that's compliant if -num params
aren't allowed any more?

Chris


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
Next
From: "Rod Taylor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Domain Support -- another round