On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The whole thing just seems too fragile and dangerous to be worth dealing
> with given that actual usage will be a corner case. *I* sure wouldn't
> trust it to work when the chips were down.
I hope this assessment proves to be incorrect, because like Magnus and Heikki, I think this will be a major usability
improvement.It takes us from "there's a way to do that" to "it just works".
...Robert
