On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:06:34PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > The whole thing just seems too fragile and dangerous to be worth dealing
> > with given that actual usage will be a corner case. *I* sure wouldn't
> > trust it to work when the chips were down.
>
> I hope this assessment proves to be incorrect, because like Magnus and Heikki, I think this will be a major usability
improvement.It takes us from "there's a way to do that" to "it just works".
(It just works)++ :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
