> On Jul 31, 2025, at 3:21 PM, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 09:39 -0400, Greg Burd wrote:
>> I agree that enabling checksums by default is the sane default. Databases
>> should always make a best effort for data integrity, checksums are a
>> positive step in that direction.
>
> Having checksums on does not improve data integrity...
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
Hello, thanks for your reply. I agree they don't improve integrity, but they
do improve the ability to detect loss of integrity (corruption), which is a
good thing for databases to do by default. Apologies, my phrasing could have
been better.
best.
-greg
