Re: Synchronize with imath upstream - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
Date
Msg-id FB934CD7-B508-4523-B920-F0EE9CCB1756@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronize with imath upstream  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Synchronize with imath upstream  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On February 6, 2019 5:17:50 AM GMT+05:30, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>On 2019-Feb-03, David Fetter wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 07:07:36AM +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
>> > >>>>> "Noah" == Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
>
>> > So far, expressed opinions have run about 4:2 in favour of allowing
>> > mixed declarations and code.
>>
>> +1 for this.
>
>Just curious, why do you care?  If you want to use such constructs in
>extension code, you can add it in your makefiles.
>
>I'm -1 for this myself.  I think there are a few places that could
>benefit from it, but my fear is that many *more* places would get
>worse.

Because of imported code like ryu and imath? And because it can make code considerably better when used judiciously.

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests