Re: Synchronize with imath upstream - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
Date
Msg-id 20190205234750.GA2774@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronize with imath upstream  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Feb-03, David Fetter wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 07:07:36AM +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> > >>>>> "Noah" == Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:

> > So far, expressed opinions have run about 4:2 in favour of allowing
> > mixed declarations and code.
> 
> +1 for this.

Just curious, why do you care?  If you want to use such constructs in
extension code, you can add it in your makefiles.

I'm -1 for this myself.  I think there are a few places that could
benefit from it, but my fear is that many *more* places would get worse.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order(regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Internal error while setting reloption on system catalogs.