index usage for min() vs. "order by asc limit 1" - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ben Chobot
Subject index usage for min() vs. "order by asc limit 1"
Date
Msg-id F954C233-D0D3-40F8-9486-E403B1DEE8B5@silentmedia.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: index usage for min() vs. "order by asc limit 1"
List pgsql-performance
I have two queries in PG 9.1. One uses an index like I would like, the other does not. Is this expected behavior? If
so,is there any way around it?  


postgres=# explain analyze select min(id) from delayed_jobs where strand='sis_batch:account:15' group by strand;
                                                        QUERY PLAN

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GroupAggregate  (cost=0.00..8918.59 rows=66 width=29) (actual time=226.759..226.760 rows=1 loops=1)
   ->  Seq Scan on delayed_jobs  (cost=0.00..8553.30 rows=72927 width=29) (actual time=0.014..169.941 rows=72268
loops=1)
         Filter: ((strand)::text = 'sis_batch:account:15'::text)
 Total runtime: 226.817 ms
(4 rows)

postgres=# explain analyze select id from delayed_jobs where strand='sis_batch:account:15' order by id limit 1;
                                                                       QUERY PLAN

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Limit  (cost=0.00..0.33 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.097..0.098 rows=1 loops=1)
   ->  Index Scan using index_delayed_jobs_on_strand on delayed_jobs  (cost=0.00..24181.74 rows=72927 width=8) (actual
time=0.095..0.095rows=1 loops=1) 
         Index Cond: ((strand)::text = 'sis_batch:account:15'::text)
 Total runtime: 0.129 ms
(4 rows)


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: external sort performance
Next
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: index usage for min() vs. "order by asc limit 1"